From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wibrowski v. Wibrowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1998
256 A.D.2d 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 17, 1998

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.).


The appeal from the denial of custody is dismissed as moot because the children are now over the age of 18. The appeal from the purported order of protection is dismissed because it is not an order at all but merely a decision contained in an unsigned, unentered transcript of the proceeding (CPLR 5512 [a]; 2219 [b]; 2220 [a]; Matter of Juan Alejandro R., 221 A.D.2d 183), and, moreover, the purported order of protection is also moot because the one-year period it was to be in effect has now expired. Were we to review, we would find that petitioner's threatening behavior warranted both the denial of his application for custody and the granting of respondent's application for an order of protection.

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Wibrowski v. Wibrowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1998
256 A.D.2d 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Wibrowski v. Wibrowski

Case Details

Full title:STANISLAW WIBROWSKI, Appellant, v. CONCEPCION WIBROWSKI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
683 N.Y.S.2d 424

Citing Cases

Matthew A. v. Jennifer A.

The children here are all minors under New York law (seeMatter of Cokely v. Crocker , 157 AD3d 1033 [3d Dept…

Jamal v. Valentina

While the father alleged facts sufficient to warrant a hearing based on a change in circumstances ( see David…