From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitty v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Apr 21, 1894
36 A. 129 (R.I. 1894)

Opinion

April 21, 1894.

A member of a beneficial order who applies to the court for relief denied him by the organization, must show that he has complied with all the requirements of the constitution and by-laws of the order relating to the remedy he seeks.

BILL IN EQUITY for the removal of officers of an order alleged to have been illegally elected.

Dennis H. Sheehan, for petitioner.

Augustus S. Miller, for respondent.


The petition does not show that the petitioner has complied with the requirements of sections 8 and 9 of article 31 of the constitution of the order, without a compliance with which he was not entitled to be heard by the arbitration committee.

Bill dismissed.


Summaries of

Whitty v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Apr 21, 1894
36 A. 129 (R.I. 1894)
Case details for

Whitty v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WHITTY vs. DANIEL J. McCARTHY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: Apr 21, 1894

Citations

36 A. 129 (R.I. 1894)
36 A. 129

Citing Cases

Fish v. Huddell

, 4 Cal.App. 565, 88 P. 597; Hickey v. Baine, 195 Mass. 446, 81 N.E. 201; Strempel v. Rubing (Super. N Y) 4…