From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whittenburg v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 25, 2022
No. A23D0091 (Ga. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2022)

Opinion

A23D0091

10-25-2022

WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG v. THE STATE.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

William Hoyt Whittenburg filed this discretionary application from the trial court's order denying multiple post-conviction motions, including a motion for production order, a motion to make prisoner available for a video tele-conference, a motion for an evidentiary hearing, and a rule nisi. The trial court found that - at this point - Whittenburg's sole remedy for challenging his conviction is through habeas corpus proceedings. Whittenburg seeks leave to appeal this ruling, arguing that he is entitled to challenge his allegedly void sentence at any time. We lack jurisdiction.

A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 (1) n.1 (686 S.E.2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga.App. 118, 119 (676 S.E.2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow. von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 571 (2) (748 S.E.2d 446) (2013). According to Whittenburg, his sentence is void because the indictment was flawed. A challenge to the validity of an indictment is a challenge to the conviction rather than the sentence. See Thompson v. State, 304 Ga. 146, 149 (3) (816 S.E.2d 646) (2018); Jones v. State, 290 Ga.App. 490, 494 (2) (659 S.E.2d 875) (2008). The Supreme Court has made clear that a motion seeking to challenge an allegedly invalid or void judgment of conviction "is not one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case" and that an appeal from the denial of such a motion is subject to dismissal. Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 S.E.2d 150) (2010).

Because Whittenburg is not authorized to collaterally attack his conviction in this manner, this application for discretionary appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See Roberts, 286 Ga. at 532; Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (2).


Summaries of

Whittenburg v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 25, 2022
No. A23D0091 (Ga. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Whittenburg v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG v. THE STATE.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 25, 2022

Citations

No. A23D0091 (Ga. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2022)