From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whittaker v. Records

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 27, 2009
Case No. 1:08cv555 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08cv555.

August 27, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on August 6, 2009 (Doc. 22).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13) is GRANTED with prejudice. This matter is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Whittaker v. Records

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 27, 2009
Case No. 1:08cv555 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Whittaker v. Records

Case Details

Full title:Theodore Whittaker, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Hilltop Records, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 27, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:08cv555 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Waddell v. Bennett

Without such basic information as a current address from a would-be plaintiff, a court has no recourse but to…

Towbridge v. Graham Packaging Co.

Without such basic information as a current address from a would-be plaintiff, a court has no recourse but to…