From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whittaker v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Rail

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Opinion

November, 1912.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., who dissented in a memorandum upon the ground: First, that it is not shown by the evidence that the slipping of the handlebar, if it slipped, was the proximate cause of the accident. Second, that there is no probative evidence to show that the defendant knew or had occasion to know, in the exercise of the highest degree of care, that the pin which would have prevented the slipping of the handlebar was out of place.


Summaries of

Whittaker v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Rail

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1912
153 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for

Whittaker v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Rail

Case Details

Full title:HELENA M. WHITTAKER, as Administratrix, etc., of GEORGE WILBUR WHITTAKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1912

Citations

153 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)