From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitson v. Bates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Summary

In Whitson v. Bates, 246 App. Div. 726, 283 N.Y.S. 663, the defendant appealed from a judgment which apparently had been entered against him by consent.

Summary of this case from Grigsby v. Liles

Opinion

December, 1935.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.


Motion to dismiss the appeal denied, with leave to renew at the January, 1936, term if in the meantime the defendant has not applied to the Special Term to be relieved of the admission of service and the consent that the judgment be entered. The remedy of the defendant, if such consent was entered into by mistake or inadvertence, is to apply at Special Term to be relieved from the terms thereof, which will be granted or refused as a matter of discretion. As the case stands, the remedy is not by appeal.


Summaries of

Whitson v. Bates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

In Whitson v. Bates, 246 App. Div. 726, 283 N.Y.S. 663, the defendant appealed from a judgment which apparently had been entered against him by consent.

Summary of this case from Grigsby v. Liles
Case details for

Whitson v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:LILLY W. WHITSON, Respondent, v. LINDELL T. BATES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Grigsby v. Liles

(Citations Omitted.)" ( 238 N.W. 243, 244) In Whitson v. Bates, 246 App. Div. 726, 283 N.Y.S. 663, the…