From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitsitt v. Hollingsworth Logistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2167 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2167 GEB GGH PS

04-05-2013

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Plaintiff, v. HOLLINGSWORTH LOGISTICS, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

On February 14, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed February 14, 2013, are ADOPTED and defendant United States is dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

______________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Whitsitt v. Hollingsworth Logistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2167 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Whitsitt v. Hollingsworth Logistics

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Plaintiff, v. HOLLINGSWORTH LOGISTICS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 5, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2167 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)