From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitfield v. Stegkemper

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Mar 8, 2007
CASE NO. 04-14280-CIV-GRAHAM (S.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 04-14280-CIV-GRAHAM.

March 8, 2007


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Verified Motion by Defendants to Tax Costs (DE # 167, 2/8/07). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part:

Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of law no later than ten days after service of the motion as computed in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to do so may be deemed sufficient cause for granting the motion by default. (Emphasis supplied).
Having received no response from the plaintiff, and a response having been due, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the plaintiff shall file a response to the Verified Motion by Defendants to Tax Costs (DE # 167, 2/8/07) on or before March 22, 2007. The failure to file a response may result in a recommendation that the Verified Motion by Defendants to Tax Costs (DE # 167, 2/8/07) be granted in its entirety.

DONE and ORDERED, in chambers, in Miami, Florida.


Summaries of

Whitfield v. Stegkemper

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Mar 8, 2007
CASE NO. 04-14280-CIV-GRAHAM (S.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Whitfield v. Stegkemper

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN WHITFIELD, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. STEGKEMPER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Mar 8, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 04-14280-CIV-GRAHAM (S.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2007)