From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitfield v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 29, 2011
No. 10 Civ. 3038 (RJS) (RLE) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. 10 Civ. 3038 (RJS) (RLE)

11-29-2011

ERIC WHITFIELD, Petitioner, v. HAROLD N. GRAHAM, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN. District Judge:

Pro se Petitioner Eric Whitfield seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed his Petition in the Western District of New York on March 2, 2010; it was transferred to this District on April 14, 2010. By Order dated April 22, 2010, this matter was referred to the Honorable Ronald L. Ellis, Magistrate Judge.

On December 29, 2010, Judge Ellis issued the attached Report and Recommendation (the "Report") recommending that the Petition be denied. In the Report, Judge Ellis advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to the Report would constitute a waiver of those objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party has filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has expired. Cf, Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298 (2d Cir. 1993).

When no objections to a report and recommendation are made, the Court may adopt the report if there is no clear error on the face of the record. Adee Motor Cars, LLC v. Amato, 388 F. Supp. 2d 250, 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2005); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). After reviewing the record, the Court finds that Judge Ellis's well-reasoned and careful Report is not facially erroneous. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety, and for the reasons set forth therein, denies the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability will not issue, The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2011

New York, New York

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
A copy of this Order has been mailed to: Pro se Petitioner:
Erie Whitfield
Attorney for Respondent:
Susan Holly Gliner
New York County District Attorney's Office


Summaries of

Whitfield v. Graham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 29, 2011
No. 10 Civ. 3038 (RJS) (RLE) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Whitfield v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:ERIC WHITFIELD, Petitioner, v. HAROLD N. GRAHAM, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

No. 10 Civ. 3038 (RJS) (RLE) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2011)

Citing Cases

West v. New York

When no objections are filed, the Court reviews an R&R on a dispositive motion for clear error. See Whitfield…

Miller v. Napoli

When no objections are filed, the Court reviews an R&R on a dispositive motion for clear error. See Whitfield…