From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitehead v. National Crane Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 2, 1985
466 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2779.

April 2, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, William A. Herin, J.

Buschbom Panter and Bret Panter, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Merritt, Sikes Craig and Thomas H. Robertson and Marvin Nodel, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


We affirm upon a holding that a motion for change of venue based upon forum non-conveniens, unlike a motion challenging improper venue, need not be made within the time limits set forth under Rule 1.140, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Gross v. Franklin, 387 So.2d 1046, 1049 n. 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). See § 47.122, Fla. Stat. (1983). Thus, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in transferring the action to Monroe County where most of the witnesses to the decedent's accident reside. See Hu v. Crockett, 426 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Hughes Supply, Inc. v. Pearl, 403 So.2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Peterson, Howell Heather v. O'Neill, 314 So.2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Whitehead v. National Crane Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 2, 1985
466 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Whitehead v. National Crane Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD WHITEHEAD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 2, 1985

Citations

466 So. 2d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

John Christen Corp. v. Maita

The statute itself contains no time limitation. § 47.122, Fla. Stat. (1989). Whitehead v. Nat'l Crane Corp.,…

Government Employees Ins. v. Burns

Unlike a motion challenging improper venue, we note that a motion challenging venue based upon forum non…