From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whiteaker v. Multnomah Cnty. Sheriffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DISTRICT
Jun 27, 2012
3: 12-CV-00783-PK (D. Or. Jun. 27, 2012)

Opinion

3: 12-CV-00783-PK

06-27-2012

JACKIE D. WHITEAKER, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and CAPTAIN BISHOP, Defendants.


ORDER TO DISMISS

BROWN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, in accord with the Court's Order [5], has filed an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, along with his amended application, plaintiff moves to voluntarily dismiss this action without prejudice. Defendants have not been served in this prisoner civil rights action. Accordingly, the Court grants plaintiff's Motion [13].

In response to plaintiff's request for "a new habeas corpus application and [in] forma pauperis application, if needed, for reopening case," he is advised that should he choose to file a civil rights case in the future, he will need to file both a new Civil Rights Complaint and a new application to proceed in forma pauperis along with current proof of his financial status.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff's Motion [13] to voluntarily dismiss this action without prejudice is GRANTED. No filing fee will be assessed in this case.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward to plaintiff with this Order a form Civil Rights Complaint and a form application to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.,

_________________

Anna J. Brown

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Whiteaker v. Multnomah Cnty. Sheriffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DISTRICT
Jun 27, 2012
3: 12-CV-00783-PK (D. Or. Jun. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Whiteaker v. Multnomah Cnty. Sheriffs

Case Details

Full title:JACKIE D. WHITEAKER, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 27, 2012

Citations

3: 12-CV-00783-PK (D. Or. Jun. 27, 2012)