From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Young Dental

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 16, 2007
211 S.W.3d 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. ED 88151.

January 16, 2007.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, WC 442-548320, WC 442-555411.

Steve D. Brooks, MacArthur Moten, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Fielding A. Poe, Zenz Rouse, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.


ORDER


Kelvin White appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial and Relations Commission (Commission) denying him worker's compensation benefits for left leg deep vein thrombosis he alleges was the result of his work for Young Dental Manufacturing Company as a vulcanizer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The motion for an award of damages for a frivolous appeal is denied.

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

White v. Young Dental

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 16, 2007
211 S.W.3d 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

White v. Young Dental

Case Details

Full title:Kelvin WHITE, Claimant/Appellant, v. YOUNG DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jan 16, 2007

Citations

211 S.W.3d 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)