From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 31, 1991
592 A.2d 480 (D.C. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-629.

May 31, 1991.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, FERREN*, BELSON, TERRY*, STEADMAN*, SCHWELB, FARRELL, and WAGNER, Associate Judges.

Associate Judge Farrell has recused himself from this case.


ORDER


On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 27, 1990, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 10, 1991.


Summaries of

White v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 31, 1991
592 A.2d 480 (D.C. 1991)
Case details for

White v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Dorothea WHITE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: May 31, 1991

Citations

592 A.2d 480 (D.C. 1991)