From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 19, 2009
Crim. No. 2:00-CR-50(3), Civil No. 2:03-CV-842 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2009)

Opinion

Crim. No. 2:00-CR-50(3), Civil No. 2:03-CV-842.

November 19, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Petitioner White's Motion for Summary Judgment and Entry of Default Judgment Due to the Government's Failure to Respond (Dkt. 225). Mr. Whites alleges that due to the Government's failure to respond to his 60(B)(3) Motion filed on April 27, 2009, he is entitled to a default judgment. On June 3, 2009, however, Magistrate Judge King's issued a Report and Recommendation to construe the 60(B)(3) Motion as a successive § 2255 habeas petition and transfer it to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (Dkt. 214). On September 14, 2009, this Court issued an Opinion and Order adopting Judge King's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 221). As a result, Mr. White's 60(B)(3) Motion was terminated on September 14, 2009. Furthermore, because the 60(B)(3) Motion, construed as a successive § 2255 habeas petition, is now before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, this Court no longer has jurisdiction over the matter. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 19, 2009
Crim. No. 2:00-CR-50(3), Civil No. 2:03-CV-842 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2009)
Case details for

White v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES W. WHITE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

Crim. No. 2:00-CR-50(3), Civil No. 2:03-CV-842 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2009)