From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Trew

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 8, 2012
722 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. 2012)

Summary

granting motion to dismiss notice of appeal filed pursuant to § 7A-30 but granting simultaneously filed petition for discretionary review of Court of Appeals' decision

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Lewis

Opinion

No. 33PA12.

2012-03-8

Mark W. WHITE v. Robert J. TREW.

Brian R. Berman, Assistant Attorney General, for Trew, Robert J. C. Amanda Martin, Raleigh, for White, Mark W.


Brian R. Berman, Assistant Attorney General, for Trew, Robert J. C. Amanda Martin, Raleigh, for White, Mark W. James M. Hash, Raleigh, for White, Mark W.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of January 2012 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of March 2012.”

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.


Summaries of

White v. Trew

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 8, 2012
722 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. 2012)

granting motion to dismiss notice of appeal filed pursuant to § 7A-30 but granting simultaneously filed petition for discretionary review of Court of Appeals' decision

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Lewis
Case details for

White v. Trew

Case Details

Full title:Mark W. WHITE v. Robert J. TREW.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

722 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. 2012)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. Lewis

Thus, petitioner may not simply deem his appeal as one pursuant to § 7A-30(1) and demand the appointment of…