From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Stayton Canning Company

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 15, 1980
616 P.2d 579 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-1307, CA 17200

Argued and submitted August 11, 1980

Reversed September 15, 1980

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Mike Dye, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Scott M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cheney Kelley, Portland.

Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed.


In determining that this claimant is permanently and totally disabled, the referee properly analyzed the factors of claimant's age, training, aptitude, adaptability to do nonphysical labor, mental capacity and emotional condition, as well as the state of the labor market. Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser, 30 Or. App. 403, 409, 567 P.2d 567 (1977).

In making a determination that claimant has only a permanent partial disability, the Board erred.

Reversed.


Summaries of

White v. Stayton Canning Company

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 15, 1980
616 P.2d 579 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

White v. Stayton Canning Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of WHITE, Petitioner, v. STAYTON CANNING…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 15, 1980

Citations

616 P.2d 579 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
616 P.2d 579