From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State ex rel. Nev. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 24, 2012
381 P.3d 675 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 61854.

12-24-2012

Matthew Scott WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada IN RELATION TO the NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Warden Renee Baker; and Associate Warden Burns, Respondents.

Matthew Scott White Attorney General/Ely


Matthew Scott White

Attorney General/Ely

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Proper person appellant seeks to challenge a district court order directing respondents to file an answer to the petition for mandamus relief that he filed in district court. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Additionally, it appears from the documents before us the appellant is not an aggrieved party. See NRAP 3A(a) ; Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 446, 874 P.2d 729, 734 (1994). Accordingly we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

White v. State ex rel. Nev. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 24, 2012
381 P.3d 675 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

White v. State ex rel. Nev. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Matthew Scott WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada IN RELATION TO the…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Dec 24, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 675 (Nev. 2012)