From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 22, 2009
19 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1D09-1411.

September 10, 2009. Rehearing Denied October 22, 2009.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

Richard M. White, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


While on parole, the appellant was arrested for possession of cocaine. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court sentenced the appellant to 24 months' imprisonment for possession of cocaine to run concurrently with his parole violation "at the discretion of the parole board." In its discretion, the Department of Corrections chose to run the sentences consecutively. The appellant filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), arguing that the trial court improperly delegated discretion to the Department of Corrections, which has no authority to make sentencing decisions. We agree.

Even if part of a negotiated plea agreement, a trial court cannot defer the structure of a sentence to the Department of Corrections because the executive branch agencies lack sentencing authority. See Richardson v. State, 947 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The State concedes error, but suggests that an evidentiary hearing may not be necessary if the State Attorney's office has no objection to concurrent sentences. We accordingly reverse and remand with directions for the trial court either to hold an evidentiary hearing or to enter an amended judgment showing White's sentences to be concurrent.

REVERSED AND REMANDED, with instructions.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 22, 2009
19 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard M. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 22, 2009

Citations

19 So. 3d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Widemond v. State

Because the appellant has alleged facially sufficient claims for ineffective assistance of counsel and an…

Peters v. State

Mr. Peters alleged that the DOC forfeited his earned gain time; as a result, the DOC decided that he will…