From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 7, 1994
645 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-1456.

December 7, 1994.

An appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County; Thomas M. Carney, Judge.

Arthur Joel Berger, Walter A. Reynoso, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Cecily Robinson-Duffie and Charles Fahlbusch, Assts. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


This is an appeal by the defendant Samuel White from judgments of conviction and sentences for (1) attempted first-degree murder with a firearm, (2) attempted manslaughter with a firearm, (3) three counts of robbery with a firearm, and (4) attempted robbery. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

First, the defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the defendant's conviction and sentence for one count of robbery with a firearm of Katherine Sanders must be reversed because there is no evidence that the defendant took any money or other property from the person or custody of Katherine Sanders, and, consequently, the evidence is insufficient to convict for this offense. § 812.13(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); Jackson v. State, 449 So.2d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see Arnold v. State, 83 So.2d 105, 108 (Fla. 1955). Because the reversal of this conviction may change the sentencing guidelines range in this case, we must reverse the sentences imposed on the remaining convictions so that the defendant may be resentenced on such convictions.

Second, we have examined the remaining points on appeal raised by the defendant and conclude that no reversible error is presented by any of these points. The final judgment of conviction and sentence for armed robbery of Katherine Sanders on count IV of the information is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to set aside such conviction and sentence and to enter a judgment of acquittal thereon. The remaining final judgments of conviction under review are affirmed, but the sentences imposed thereunder are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to resentence the defendant on these convictions with a corrected sentencing guidelines scoresheet. The defendant need not be present for the resentencing.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.


Summaries of

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 7, 1994
645 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL WHITE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 7, 1994

Citations

645 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Godinez v. State

Reversal of a conviction "may change the sentencing guidelines range" and require a reversal of the sentences…