From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 19, 1932
53 S.W.2d 608 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)

Opinion

No. 15643.

Delivered October 19, 1932.

Burglary — Bills of Exception — Practice.

Where exceptions to the court's charge are not approved as having been properly presented to the trial court, the same cannot be considered on appeal.

Appeal from the District Court of Montgomery County. Tried below before the Hon. S. A. McCall, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for burglary; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for seven years

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

L. M. Cox, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction for burglary; punishment, seven years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record no bills of exception. A number of exceptions were taken to the charge of the court and appear to have been filed with the clerk of said court, but same are not approved as having been properly presented to the trial court and can not be by us considered. Appellant asked a special charge, which was refused by the court, and we find no exception nor objection to this action of the court. There is in the record no statement of facts.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

White v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 19, 1932
53 S.W.2d 608 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:WHEELER WHITE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 19, 1932

Citations

53 S.W.2d 608 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)
53 S.W.2d 608