Opinion
Nos. 05-07-01580-CR, 05-07-01582-CR, No. 05-07-01581-CR, 05-07-01583-CR
Opinion Filed November 25, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F07-71752-LK, F07-71753-LK, F07-72475-QK, F07-72476-QK.
Before Chief Justice THOMAS and Justices MORRIS and FRANCIS. Opinion By Chief Justice THOMAS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Darryl Lynn White waived a jury and pleaded guilty to three aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon offenses and one robbery offense. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 29.02(a), 29.03(a) (Vernon 2003). The trial court assessed punishment at forty years' imprisonment for each aggravated robbery and twenty years' imprisonment for the robbery. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree these appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support these appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.