From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Rogers

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
Nov 30, 2021
Civil Action 1:20-CV-187-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:20-CV-187-GHD-DAS 1:20-CV-188-GHD-DAS

11-30-2021

SIERRA WHITE PLAINTIFF v. TONY ROGERS, HENRY RANDLE, CHAZ THOMPSON, EDWARD HAYES, AND KEVIN CROOK DEFENDANTS SIERRA WHITE PLAINTIFF v. KEVIN CROOK, HENRY RANDLE, UNKNOWN HOWARD AND CHAZ THOMPSON DEFENDANTS


ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY

DAVID A. SANDERS U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The defendants have moved to dismiss this action, or alternatively to stay this civil action until the conclusion of the state criminal proceedings. In part the motion to dismiss raises the defense of qualified immunity. Therefore, pursuant to L.U.Civ.R. 16(b)(3)(B), the court stays discovery in this action, pending resolution of the defendants' motion to dismiss.

If the motion to dismiss is denied, in whole or in part, the parties shall contact the offices of the Magistrate Judge, within 14 days of the decision to reschedule a case management conference.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. Rogers

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
Nov 30, 2021
Civil Action 1:20-CV-187-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

White v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:SIERRA WHITE PLAINTIFF v. TONY ROGERS, HENRY RANDLE, CHAZ THOMPSON, EDWARD…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 1:20-CV-187-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 30, 2021)