From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Richards

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 1, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-092 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 1, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-092

10-01-2015

GREGORY G. WHITE, Petitioner, v. RHONDA RICHARDS, Warden, Madison Correctional Institution, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
ORDER OVERRULING WHITE'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. 16) TO THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED ON JULY 21, 2015 (DOC. 12) AND JULY 22, 2015 (DOC. 14); OVERRULING WHITE'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. 19) TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED AUGUST 21, 2015 (DOC. 18); ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED JULY 21, 2015 (DOC. 12), REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED JULY 22, 2105 (DOC. 14), AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED AUGUST 21, 2015 (DOC. 18) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE

This habeas corpus case is before the Court on the Objections (Docs. 16, 19) filed by Petitioner Gregory G. White ("White") to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations entered July 21, 2015 (Doc. 12), Report and Recommendations entered July 22, 2015 (Doc. 14), and Supplemental Report and Recommendations entered August 21, 2015 (Doc. 18). The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Court exercise jurisdiction over this case and dismiss White's petition for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 with prejudice.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that White's Objections (Docs. 16, 19) to the Report and Recommendations entered July 21, 2015 (Doc. 12), Report and Recommendations entered July 22, 2015 (Doc. 14), and Supplemental Report and Recommendations entered August 21, 2015 (Doc. 18) are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS in their entirety the Report and Recommendations entered July 21, 2015 (Doc. 12), the Report and Recommendations entered July 22, 2015 (Doc. 14), and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations entered August 21, 2015 (Doc. 18). Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:

• This Court has jurisdiction over this matter, as White's petition does not constitute a second or successive habeas corpus petition barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2244;

• The Court DENIES White's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13);

• The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE White's petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 1);

• Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with the Court's decision, White should be DENIED a certificate of appealability;

• The Court CERTIFIES to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore White should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis; and

• The Clerk is ORDERED to terminate this case on the docket of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Thursday, October 1, 2015.

s/Thomas M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Richards

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 1, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-092 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 1, 2015)
Case details for

White v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY G. WHITE, Petitioner, v. RHONDA RICHARDS, Warden, Madison…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Oct 1, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-092 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 1, 2015)

Citing Cases

White v. Robinson

(Petition in 3:15-cv-092, ECF No. 1.) District Judge Thomas Rose dismissed that case with prejudice. White v.…

White v. Robinson

(Petition in 3:15-cv-092, ECF No. 1.) District Judge Thomas Rose dismissed that case with prejudice. White v.…