From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Orr-Lyons Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 24, 1985
336 S.E.2d 467 (S.C. 1985)

Opinion

22391

Heard October 8, 1985.

Decided October 24, 1985.

J. Wright Horton, of Horton, Drawdy, Ward Johnson, Greenville, for appellants. C. Ben Bowen and Linda B. McKenzie, of Abrams, Bowen Parham, Greenville, and V. Laniel Chapman, of Chapman and King, Anderson, for respondent.


Heard Oct. 8, 1985.

Decided Oct. 24, 1985.


Appellants contend that (1) respondent failed to give notice of her injury to her employer within ninety days of its occurrence as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 42-15-20 (Law. Co-op. 1976); (2) respondent failed to file a claim with the Industrial Commission within two years after the accident as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 42-15-40 (Law. Co-op. 1976); and (3) respondent did not suffer injurious exposure to cotton dust during American Motorists Insurance Company's extension of coverage and therefore American Motorists is not the liable carrier.

The Court of Appeals addressed these same issues in the factually similar case of Hanks v. Blair Mills, Inc., 335 S.E.2d 91 (S.C.App. 1985). We agree with Hanks. Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court is

Affirmed.

NESS, C.J., and GREGORY, CHANDLER and FINNEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

White v. Orr-Lyons Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 24, 1985
336 S.E.2d 467 (S.C. 1985)
Case details for

White v. Orr-Lyons Mills

Case Details

Full title:Perry Lee WHITE, Respondent, v. ORR-LYONS MILLS, Employer, and American…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 24, 1985

Citations

336 S.E.2d 467 (S.C. 1985)
336 S.E.2d 467

Citing Cases

Bass v. Isochem

An employee must givenotice of an occupational disease claim within ninetydays after the date he becomes…

Bailey v. Covil Corp.

A claim for total disability benefits arising from an occupational disease must be filed within two years…