From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Nakamura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 7, 2020
Case No. CV 20-9141 FMO (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2020)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding claims of fraud, identity theft, human trafficking, conversion, securities fraud, and racketeering barred for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rooker-Feldman and subject to dismissal because they failed “to plead anything close to approaching a cognizable claim”

Summary of this case from Blakeley v. Gunderson
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Case No. CV 20-9141 FMO (MAAx)

12-07-2020

SEKAYI RUDO WHITE, Plaintiff, v. KIRK J. NAKAMURA, et al., Defendants.

Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the court's Order Re: Motion to Dismiss, IT IS ADJUDGED THAT the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. Dated this 7th day of December, 2020.

/s/_________

Fernando M. Olguin

United States District Judge

Summaries of

White v. Nakamura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 7, 2020
Case No. CV 20-9141 FMO (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2020)

finding claims of fraud, identity theft, human trafficking, conversion, securities fraud, and racketeering barred for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rooker-Feldman and subject to dismissal because they failed “to plead anything close to approaching a cognizable claim”

Summary of this case from Blakeley v. Gunderson
Case details for

White v. Nakamura

Case Details

Full title:SEKAYI RUDO WHITE, Plaintiff, v. KIRK J. NAKAMURA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 7, 2020

Citations

Case No. CV 20-9141 FMO (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2020)

Citing Cases

Blakeley v. Gunderson

; White v. Nakamura, No. CV 20-9141 FMO (MAAx), 2020 WL 8572318, at *1-3 (C.D. Cal Dec. 7, 2020) (finding…

1 Citing Cases