From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Moses

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1858
11 Cal. 69 (Cal. 1858)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, County of San Francisco.

         Plaintiffs, as executors of O. B. White, deceased, commenced an action of ejectment against defendants for seven-sixteenths of a certain fifty vara lot in San Francisco. Defendants answered, denying generally the allegations of the complaint, and setting up title in J. Y. Limantour.

         A nonsuit was entered, on the ground that the plaintiffs had not established their character as executors, and afterwards, on the application of the plaintiffs, the judgment of nonsuit was vacated and a new trial granted. From this order defendants appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         J. P. Treadwell, for Appellants.

          Wm. W. Crane, jr., for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Terry, C. J., after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         Under the pleadings of the case, no proof of the appointment of plaintiffs as executors was necessary. Under our system of practice, a general denial is equivalent to the general issue at common law, and it does not put in issue the plaintiff's title to sue. (See 5 Phil. Ev. 359; 15 Johns. 208.)

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

White v. Moses

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1858
11 Cal. 69 (Cal. 1858)
Case details for

White v. Moses

Case Details

Full title:WHITE et al., EXECUTORS OF OLIVER B. WHITE, v. MOSES et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1858

Citations

11 Cal. 69 (Cal. 1858)

Citing Cases

Halleck v. Mixer

A general denial does not put in issue the right of plaintiffs as executors to sue, or compel them to prove…

Davanay v. Eggenhoff

The general denial in this case is equivalent to the general issue at common law, and puts in issue all the…