From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. McDonough

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 12, 2024
23-cv-04545-SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-04545-SI

04-12-2024

RICHARD CROSBY WHITE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

SUSAN ILLSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In an order filed March 22, 2024, the Court ordered plaintiff Richard Crosby White to show cause in writing by April 5, 2024, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. White did not file a response to the Court's order and has not taken any action in this case since January 26, 2024, and defendants have yet to be served. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the Court DISMISSES this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. McDonough

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 12, 2024
23-cv-04545-SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2024)
Case details for

White v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CROSBY WHITE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 12, 2024

Citations

23-cv-04545-SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2024)