White v. Marshall

Full title: ROY HENRY WHTIE, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Respondents.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Case No. CV 09-7071 VBF(JC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 09-7071 VBF(JC)

08-01-2011

ROY HENRY WHTIE, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Respondents.

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the "Petition") and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondents.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE