From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Longmire

Supreme Court of California
Mar 7, 1883
63 Cal. 232 (Cal. 1883)

Opinion

         APPEAL from two orders of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL:

         Naphtaly, Freidenrich & Ackerman, for Appellants.

         John A. Wright, for Respondents.


         OPINION

         The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

         PER CURIAM

         The appeal in this case is from two special orders made after final judgment taken by virtue of the third subdivision of section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure. On such appeal, the appellant must furnish the court with a copy of the notice of appeal, of the orders appealed from, and of the papers used on the hearing in the court below. (Code Civ. Proc. § 951.)

         As the papers found in the transcript are not identified as having been used on the hearing of the court below, the orders appealed from must be affirmed. ( Baker v. Snyder, 58 Cal. 617.)

         Orders affirmed.


Summaries of

White v. Longmire

Supreme Court of California
Mar 7, 1883
63 Cal. 232 (Cal. 1883)
Case details for

White v. Longmire

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. WHITE ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. JONATHAN LONGMIRE, DEFENDANT, JACOB…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 7, 1883

Citations

63 Cal. 232 (Cal. 1883)