From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Jesus

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 6, 2023
23-cv-02328-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-02328-RS (PR)

11-06-2023

REGINALD DWAIN WHITE, Plaintiff, v. D. JESUS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order to either pay the full filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failure to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page. The motion must also be accompanied by full payment for the $402.00 filing fee or a complete application to proceed IFP. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. Jesus

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 6, 2023
23-cv-02328-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2023)
Case details for

White v. Jesus

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD DWAIN WHITE, Plaintiff, v. D. JESUS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 6, 2023

Citations

23-cv-02328-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2023)