From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Great Falls Mun. Court

Supreme Court of Montana
May 3, 2022
OP 22-0143 (Mont. May. 3, 2022)

Opinion

OP 22-0143

05-03-2022

SHAWN MICHAEL WHITE, Petitioner, v. GREAT FALLS MUNICIPAL COURT, HON. ASHLEY WILKINSON, Presiding for HON. STEVE BOLSTAD, Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner Shawn Michael White, via pro bono counsel, seeks a writ of supervisory control to reverse the determination of the Great Falls Municipal Court not to appoint counsel for White in his pending criminal matter in its Cause No. TK-2021-3983. After receiving White's Petition, we granted the District Court and the State the opportunity to respond in accordance with M. R. App. P. 14(7).

The State responded to White's petition, alleging that the petition is moot because the Great Falls Municipal Court appointed counsel for White two days after White filed the petition for writ of supervisory control in this Court.

The State is correct that White's petition is moot as the Great Falls Municipal Court appointed counsel to represent him, thereby providing him the precise relief he requested in his petition before this Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for a writ of supervisory control is DENIED and DISMISSED as MOOT.

The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Great Falls Municipal Court Cause No. TK-2021-3983, the Honorable Ashley Wilkinson, and the Honorable Steve Bolstad.


Summaries of

White v. Great Falls Mun. Court

Supreme Court of Montana
May 3, 2022
OP 22-0143 (Mont. May. 3, 2022)
Case details for

White v. Great Falls Mun. Court

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN MICHAEL WHITE, Petitioner, v. GREAT FALLS MUNICIPAL COURT, HON…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: May 3, 2022

Citations

OP 22-0143 (Mont. May. 3, 2022)