From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Dyess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 10, 2013
2:12-cv-01893-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-cv-01893-APG-NJK

05-10-2013

THOMAS WHITE AND LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 872, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff, v. YOLANDA DYESS, ROSEMARY PHILLIPS, and STEPHANY SHELBY, Defendants.


ORDER

(IFP App - Dkt. #1)

Defendant Yolanda Dyess requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. #1) by submitting an application to proceed in in forma pauperis on November 5, 2012. However, as a defendant in this matter, it is unclear what fees she needs waived. Further, her application is almost entirely deficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Additionally, Dyess has since retained counsel. Thus, it appears as though the request was filed in error.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant Dyess' Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DEEMED WITHDRAWN.
2. Plaintiff may file a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis which complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1915, no later than May 24, 2013.
3. Alternatively, Defendant Dyess may file notice with the Court that she does not seek to proceed In Forma Pauperis, no later than May 24, 2013.

_____________

NANCY J. KOPPE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Dyess

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 10, 2013
2:12-cv-01893-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

White v. Dyess

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WHITE AND LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 872…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-01893-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 10, 2013)