From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Duncan

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Jan 15, 2010
1:10CV14-03-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010)

Opinion

1:10CV14-03-MU.

January 15, 2010


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on initial review of Plaintiff's Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed January 14, 2010. (Document No. 1.)

Plaintiff alleges in his Complaint that while he was a pretrial detainee at Buncombe County detention facility, the defendants used excessive force against him; denied/delayed him medical care; withheld his mail, denied him access to a telephone and refused to respond to his grievance. The undersigned finds that the Defendants should file an Answer detailing and responding to each Plaintiff's allegation.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

SO ORDERED.

1) The Clerk shall issue summons and deliver it forthwith to the U.S. Marshall who will make service of process without additional cost; and
2) Defendants shall file an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

White v. Duncan

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Jan 15, 2010
1:10CV14-03-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010)
Case details for

White v. Duncan

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT KEITH WHITE, II, Plaintiff, v. VAN DUNCAN; AARON ZAVAL; RON WRIGHT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: Jan 15, 2010

Citations

1:10CV14-03-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010)