From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Director, Ohio Department, of Rehabilitation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Aug 1, 2006
Case No. 1:04-cv-518 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:04-cv-518.

August 1, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #6), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on July 17, 2006, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the Petition with prejudice, finding the Petition barred by the statute of limitations and because the sole ground for relief was procedurally defaulted. Because these conclusions would be reached by any reasonable jurist reviewing the case, Petitioner will be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

White v. Director, Ohio Department, of Rehabilitation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Aug 1, 2006
Case No. 1:04-cv-518 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2006)
Case details for

White v. Director, Ohio Department, of Rehabilitation

Case Details

Full title:KENDALL D. WHITE, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT, OF…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:04-cv-518 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2006)