White v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Full title: KRISTIN NICOLE WHITE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court: United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 15, 2024

No. 3117-22 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 15, 2024)

Opinion

3117-22

03-15-2024

KRISTIN NICOLE WHITE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On January 25, 2022, petitioner filed the petition to commence this case seeking review of a notice issued to her for her 2019 tax year. On June 6, 2022, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that the filing fee was not paid. On March 8, 2024, petitioner filed a Motion to Vacate.

A motion to vacate a decision generally must be filed "within 30 days after the decision has been entered, unless the Court shall otherwise permit." Rule 162, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Furthermore, the Tax Court generally cannot consider a motion to vacate that is made after a decision becomes final. Abatti v. Commissioner, 859 F.2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988), aff'g, 86 T.C. 1319 (1986). A decision becomes final "[u]pon the expiration of the time allowed for filing a notice of appeal, if no such notice has been duly filed within such time." Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) section 7481(a)(1). The notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days to be timely. I.R.C. sec. 7483. Petitioner filed her motion to vacate more than a year after the Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction was entered in this case on June 6, 2022. Accordingly, the Court's decision was already final when petitioner filed her motion to vacate.

Once a decision becomes final, the Court's jurisdiction to revise or vacate that decision is severely limited. As discussed in Snow v. Commissioner, 142 T.C. 413, 419-420 (2014), as a general rule, the finality of a decision is absolute, with the few following exceptions: (1) where there was fraud on the Court, (2) where the Court never acquired jurisdiction to make a decision, and (3) where the Court needs to correct a clerical error in the decision discovered after the decision has become final. Petitioner has not shown that any of these exceptions apply to this case.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Vacate is denied.