From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. City of Detroit Election Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 30, 2013
495 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket No. 147875. COA No. 318683.

2013-10-30

Desmond M. WHITE and Robert Davis, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. CITY OF DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION, City Clerk for the City of Detroit, Wayne County Board of Canvassers, and Accuform, Inc., Defendants–Appellees, and Mike Duggan, Intervening Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The motion to strike the intervening defendant's brief in opposition is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented will cause a “delay in final adjudication ... likely to cause substantial harm” or that “the appeal is from a ruling that a provision of the Michigan Constitution, a Michigan statute, a rule or regulation included in the Michigan Administrative Code, or any other action of the legislative or executive branch of state government is invalid.” MCR 7.302(B)(4). The question of awarding costs is reserved until further order of the Court.


Summaries of

White v. City of Detroit Election Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 30, 2013
495 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

White v. City of Detroit Election Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:Desmond M. WHITE and Robert Davis, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. CITY OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 30, 2013

Citations

495 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2013)
838 N.W.2d 699

Citing Cases

House of Representatives v. Governor

Our past practice also indicates it is mandatory, as we have denied bypass applications on the basis that the…