From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Brunsman

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 27, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-979 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-979.

October 27, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


On July 27, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations, and again raises all of the same arguments he previously presented.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review. For the reasons detailed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, this Court likewise concludes that none of petitioner's arguments are availing. The record simply fails to reflect that habeas corpus relief is warranted.

Therefore, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

White v. Brunsman

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 27, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-979 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 27, 2010)
Case details for

White v. Brunsman

Case Details

Full title:Marcus D. White, Petitioner, v. Timothy Brunsman, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 27, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-979 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 27, 2010)

Citing Cases

White v. Richards

In 2007 White sought relief in this Court from the 2004 conviction. White v. Brunsman, Case No. 3:07-cv-26.…