White v. Brunsman

Full title: Marcus D. White, Petitioner, v. Timothy Brunsman, Warden, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 27, 2010

Case No. 2:08-cv-979 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-979.

October 27, 2010

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL WATSON, District Judge

On July 27, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations, and again raises all of the same arguments he previously presented.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review. For the reasons detailed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, this Court likewise concludes that none of petitioner's arguments are availing. The record simply fails to reflect that habeas corpus relief is warranted.

Therefore, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.