From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
NO. 10-1233 (E.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 10-1233

05-03-2012

ERNEST WHITE v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security


CIVIL ACTION


ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey and Plaintiff's objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

Plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation present no new issues and arguments. The issues and arguments that have been set forth by such objections have been correctly and adequately addressed by the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation which is now approved and adopted.

3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED;

4. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and against Plaintiff.

BY THE COURT:

__________________

John R. Padova, J.


Summaries of

White v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 3, 2012
NO. 10-1233 (E.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)
Case details for

White v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST WHITE v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

NO. 10-1233 (E.D. Pa. May. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hanson v. Astrue

Any failure to engage in a detailed function-by-function assessment does not per se constitute reversible…