From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Asset Default Mgmt.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 31, 2024
CV 24-5253-DMG (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-5253-DMG (JCx)

07-31-2024

Nadine White v. Asset Default Management, Inc., et al.


CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

DOLLY M. GEE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

On June 21, 2024, Defendant Asset Default Management, Inc. (“ADM”) removed this case to this Court on the basis that the Property at issue, located at 1316 Beverly Grove Place, Los Angeles, CA, was part of a bankruptcy estate and thus federal jurisdiction was proper. See Ntc. of Removal ¶¶ 1-15.

As of July 22, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court has issued an Order Approving Stipulation re: Trustee's Notice of Intention to Abandon the Property. See In re MDRCA Properties, LLC, Case No. 23-bk-18108-BR(C.D. Cal. July 22, 2024), Doc. #112. Accordingly, the Property is no longer part of the bankruptcy estate, obviating the basis for federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334, 1452.

Defendant is therefore ordered to show cause (“OSC”) in writing by no later than August 12, 2024, why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to file a timely satisfactory response by this deadline will result in remand to the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. Asset Default Mgmt.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 31, 2024
CV 24-5253-DMG (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)
Case details for

White v. Asset Default Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:Nadine White v. Asset Default Management, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 31, 2024

Citations

CV 24-5253-DMG (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)