From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White Bay Enter., Ltd. v. Newsday, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2001
288 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted September 26, 2001.

November 5, 2001.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff White Bay Enterprises, Ltd., appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated October 11, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendant, Newsday, Inc., and the separate motion of the nonparties, Fresh Forest, Ltd., and JF Four Star, Inc., to quash two subpoenas duces tecum served upon the nonparties.

Sylvor Richman, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Iris S. Richman of counsel), for appellant.

Orrick, Herrington Sutcliffe, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Richard W. Mark of counsel), for nonparty respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting the motions to quash the subpoenas duces tecum served on the nonparties, as the discovery sought is not material and necessary to the prosecution of the action (see, Palma v. Iona Coll., 259 A.D.2d 532; Feeley v. Midas Props., 168 A.D.2d 416). Further, the subpoenas are overly broad and unduly burdensome.

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

White Bay Enter., Ltd. v. Newsday, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2001
288 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

White Bay Enter., Ltd. v. Newsday, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WHITE BAY ENTERPRISES, LTD., APPELLANT, v. NEWSDAY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Trahan v. Galea, 2008 NY Slip Op 31202(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 3/27/2008)

The non-party motion to quash the subject subpoenas is granted without opposition. Apart from the absence of…

Trahan v. Galea

The non-party motion to quash the subject subpoenas is granted without opposition. Apart from the absence of…