From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitaker v. Kempt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 10, 2021
Case No. 6:19-cv-349-JDK-JDL (E.D. Tex. Jun. 10, 2021)

Opinion

6:19-cv-349-JDK-JDL 6:19CV416 JCB/KNM

06-10-2021

ANDREW PJ WHITAKER, #1984096, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN KEMPT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JEREMY D. KERNODLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Andrew PJ Whitaker, a Texas Department of Criminal Justice inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition.

On May 20, 2021, Judge Love issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court dismiss this case with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Docket No. 31. Plaintiff timely objected. Docket No. 33.

Where a party timely objects to the Report and Recommendation, the Court reviews the objected-to findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days).

Having conducted a de novo review of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct, and Plaintiffs objections are without merit. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 31) as the opinion of the District Court. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. All pending motions are denied as moot.


Summaries of

Whitaker v. Kempt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 10, 2021
Case No. 6:19-cv-349-JDK-JDL (E.D. Tex. Jun. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Whitaker v. Kempt

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW PJ WHITAKER, #1984096, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN KEMPT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jun 10, 2021

Citations

Case No. 6:19-cv-349-JDK-JDL (E.D. Tex. Jun. 10, 2021)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Holt

. Whitaker v. Kempt, No. 6:19CV349, 2021 WL 2388978, at **6, 9 (E.D. Tex. May 20, 2021), report and…

Cook v. Horsley

(“Because [plaintiff] merely alleges an incidental viewing by a member of the opposite sex during a strip…