From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whistance v. Flick

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Sep 1, 2009
290 S.W.3d 813 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. WD69522.

July 28, 2009. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 1, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Robert L. Trout, Judge.

Jeffrey S. Eastman, for Appellant.

Christopher F. Arbuckle, for Respondent.

Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.


ORDER


David and Nancy Whistance appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of Cary Diekmann and against the Whistances on their suit for breach of a real estate contract. On appeal, the Whistances claim that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence and is against the weight of the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Whistance v. Flick

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Sep 1, 2009
290 S.W.3d 813 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Whistance v. Flick

Case Details

Full title:David E. WHISTANCE, Appellant, v. Cary Lyn Diekmann FLICK, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Sep 1, 2009

Citations

290 S.W.3d 813 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)