From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whirlpool Corp. v. LG Electronics

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 19, 2008
296 F. App'x 70 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 2007-1370, 2007-1402.

October 10, 2008. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied November 19, 2008.

Circuit Judge Schall did not participate in the vote.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, 1:04-CV-100, Robert Holmes Bell, Judge.

Daniel A. Boehnen, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert Berghoff LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Christopher M. Cavan and Sean M. Sullivan.

Kenneth R. Adamo, Jones Day, of Cleveland, OH, argued for defendant-appellant General Electric Company. With him on the brief were Lawrence D. Rosenberg, of Washington, DC, and Susan M. Gerber, of Cleveland, Ohio. Of counsel were Gerald R. Ross and Douglas R. Cole, of Atlanta, Georgia.

Richard L. Stroup, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al. With him on the brief were Don 0. Burley, Gerson S. Panitch, Parmanand K. Sharma, and Andrew C. Sonu.

RADER, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.



Judgment


This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Whirlpool Corp. v. LG Electronics

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 19, 2008
296 F. App'x 70 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Whirlpool Corp. v. LG Electronics

Case Details

Full title:WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and Whirlpool Patents Company, Plaintiffs-Cross…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

296 F. App'x 70 (Fed. Cir. 2008)