From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whipple v. Warden, S. Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 17, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-119 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-119

12-17-2014

FONTA WHIPPLE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Southern Correctional Facility, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docs. 15, 20)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on October 6, 2015, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 15). The Petitioner filed objections. (Doc. 18). The Court recommitted the case to the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 19), who submitted a Supplemental Report and Recommendations on November 12, 2014 (Doc. 20). The Petitioner filed additional objections. (Doc. 21).

The Petitioner essentially renews his previous objections - objections which were fully addressed in the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 20). This Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's reasoning as explained therein.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Reports and Recommendations should be and are hereby adopted in their entirety. Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendations (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED;



2. The Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED;



3. This civil action is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE;



4. A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is DENIED; and



5. An application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 12/17/14

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Whipple v. Warden, S. Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 17, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-119 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Whipple v. Warden, S. Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:FONTA WHIPPLE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Southern Correctional Facility…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-119 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2014)