Opinion
Case No. 1:14-cv-119
12-17-2014
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docs. 15, 20)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on October 6, 2015, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 15). The Petitioner filed objections. (Doc. 18). The Court recommitted the case to the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 19), who submitted a Supplemental Report and Recommendations on November 12, 2014 (Doc. 20). The Petitioner filed additional objections. (Doc. 21).
The Petitioner essentially renews his previous objections - objections which were fully addressed in the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 20). This Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's reasoning as explained therein.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Reports and Recommendations should be and are hereby adopted in their entirety. Accordingly:
1. The Report and Recommendations (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED;
2. The Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED;
3. This civil action is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE;
4. A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is DENIED; and
5. An application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 12/17/14
/s/_________
Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge