affirming the trial court's decision that defendant had engaged in a "bait and switch" scheme in violation of Chapter 93A when it advertised a new car in the newspaper and negotiated with the plaintiff, only to later inform the plaintiff that the vehicle was used
Summary of this case from Presti v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.No. 05-P-422.
January 23, 2006.
Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
Amended judgment affirmed. Order for attorney's fees and costs affirmed.
affirming the trial court's decision that defendant had engaged in a "bait and switch" scheme in violation of Chapter 93A when it advertised a new car in the newspaper and negotiated with the plaintiff, only to later inform the plaintiff that the vehicle was used
Summary of this case from Presti v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.Full title:E. JOHN WHERRY, JR. vs. SHOWCASE ISUZU, INC
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Jan 23, 2006
This is not a "bait and switch" case, however, because there was no "switch" of products here; Presti…