From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 6, 2013
No. 05-11-00680-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-11-00680-CR

06-06-2013

JACOB WHEELER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 6, 2013.

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-57968-H


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Bridges, O'Neill, and Murphy

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Appellant Jacob Wheeler appeals his conviction for manslaughter. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, at life confinement. In a single issue, appellant contends the trial court erred in overruling his objection to extraneous offense evidence admitted at punishment.

In the punishment phase, the State presented evidence that appellant confessed to several extraneous offenses. Appellant asserts the trial court erred in admitting the extraneous offense evidence because the State failed to present sufficient proof appellant committed the offenses. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 37.07, § 3(a)(1) (West Supp. 2012). In particular, he asserts the State failed to prove the "corpus delicti" of the extraneous offenses. The corpus delicti doctrine requires that evidence independent of a defendant's extrajudicial confession show that the "essential nature" of the charged crime was committed by someone. Bible v. State, 162 S.W.3d 234, 246 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). The corpus delicti doctrine is concerned with preventing a conviction from being based solely upon a false confession. Id. at 247. When the offense at issue is extraneous, offered at the punishment stage, no concern about the defendant's conviction arises. Id. Therefore, the corpus delicti doctrine does not apply to extraneous offenses offered at the punishment phase. Cf. id.; see also Padron v. State, 988 S.W.2d 344, 346 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). We resolve the sole issue against appellant.

We affirm appellant's conviction.

___________________

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
110680F.U05

JUDGMENT

JACOB WHEELER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee No. 05-11-00680-CR

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 1, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-57968-H.

Opinion delivered by Justice O'Neill.

Justices Bridges and Murphy participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

____________________

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Wheeler v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 6, 2013
No. 05-11-00680-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Wheeler v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACOB WHEELER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

No. 05-11-00680-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2013)