From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. Dayton Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 20, 2013
Case No. 3:13-CV-300 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-CV-300

12-20-2013

ERIC D. WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. DAYTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER

During the preliminary pretrial conference held on December 20, 2013, Defendants' counsel raised a number of concerns regarding the timeliness and content of pro se Plaintiff's claims. In the interests of justice, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint on or before January 6, 2014. The amended complaint, which must comply with the pleading standard of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), as construed in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), shall set forth with particularity each and every claim for which Plaintiff seeks relief, including the dates of all relevant events. Defendants may file an Answer or motion in response to the amended complaint on or before January 24, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Wheeler v. Dayton Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 20, 2013
Case No. 3:13-CV-300 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Wheeler v. Dayton Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:ERIC D. WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. DAYTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Dec 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-CV-300 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 20, 2013)