Opinion
No. 07-14390.
July 18, 2008.
Robert E. Casey, Jr., Guy Hagai Weiss, Casey, Gilson Liebel, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
David R. Hughes, Davis, Pickren Seydel, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees Cross-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. D.C. Docket No. 05-02174 CV-TCB-1.
This diversity case centers on a controversy on whether Plaintiff was entitled to restricted or unrestricted shares of stock. Plaintiff says unrestricted. The District Court granted summary judgment to Defendants on the ground that no enforceable contract existed between the parties for unrestricted shares of stock. We affirm the judgment: as a matter of law, insufficient evidence supports the contention that unrestricted shares were contemplated by the parties.
On the issues dealing with sanctions, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion.
AFFIRMED.