From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Bettin

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 25, 1987
733 P.2d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

WCB 85-0546M; CA A38274 (Control), A39360

Argued and submitted January 30, 1987.

Affirmed February 25, 1987.

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Jerry K. Brown, McMinnville, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Cummins, Cummins, Brown Goodman, P.C., McMinnville.

William H. Schultz, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Peter W. Preston, and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary Conboy, Portland.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board awarding claimant additional temporary total disability. The Board reopened the claim, on which aggravation rights had expired, on its own motion, without expressly finding that there had been a worsening of the compensated condition. The Board, on its own motion, is not authorized to award such benefits without that finding.

On de novo review, we find that claimant has shown that he has suffered a worsening of his compensable condition and that the Board correctly reopened the claim, thereby authorizing the award of temporary total disability. See Gwynn v. SAIF, 84 Or. App. 67, 733 P.2d 895 (1987).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Bettin

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 25, 1987
733 P.2d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Bettin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Phillip L. Bettin, Claimant…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 25, 1987

Citations

733 P.2d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
733 P.2d 897