From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weyburn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 31, 2000
763 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 1D99-2910.

Opinion filed March 31, 2000.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Joseph Q. Tarbuck, Judge.

Edward Everette Weyburn, III, pro se, appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Karen M. Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Edward Everette Weyburn, III, was on probation when he committed another criminal offense. He was convicted of the new offense and is serving a term of imprisonment. Weyburn filed motions with the trial court which sought to compel authorities to take some action with regard to his probation. When those motions were denied, Weyburn appealed.

The state moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that the orders to be reviewed are not appealable orders. While we agree the orders are not appealable, there is authority for review in this situation by extraordinary writ. Subervi v. Miller, 555 So.2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Rather than dismiss, we elect to treat the appeal as a petition for prohibition in accordance with Subervi and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c). On the merits, however, we find the trial judge reached the right result. Hall v. State, 512 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Gonzalez v. State, 447 So.2d 381 (Fla.3d DCA 1984). Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition, so treated, is denied.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weyburn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 31, 2000
763 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Weyburn v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD EVERETTE WEYBURN, III, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 31, 2000

Citations

763 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

McIntosh v. State

We have redesignated this case as a petition for writ of prohibition and treated petitioner's initial brief…